OFFENCESCentral

Section 23 of The Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992

(1)Any person subject to this Act who disobeys in such manner as to show a wilful defiance of authority any lawful command given personally by his superior officer in the execution of his office whether the same is given orally, or in writing or by signal or otherwise, shall, on conviction by a Force Court, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.
(2)Any person subject to this Act who disobeys any lawful command given by his superior officer shall, on conviction by a Force Court,—
1. (a)if he commits such offence when on active duty, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned; and
2. (b)if he commits such offence when not on active duty, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.

Summary

This section sets the punishments for disobeying the lawful commands of a superior officer.
If a person willfully defies a command given directly by a superior, they face up to fourteen years in prison.
Disobeying a lawful command while on active duty also carries a maximum fourteen-year prison sentence.
If the disobedience happens when not on active duty, the maximum penalty is five years.

Practical examples

1On 10 May 2024, Constable Amit is on border patrol and his commanding officer verbally orders him to secure a checkpoint, but Amit laughs, throws down his radio, and refuses to go.

2During peacetime at the base camp on 14 August 2025, Head Constable Rajesh is told to report for standard morning drill but stays in his bed instead, ignoring the written roster.

FAQ

1. What is the punishment for defying a direct order under Section 23 of The Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992?

Under Section 23 of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992, showing willful defiance to a direct command from a superior can result in up to fourteen years of imprisonment.

2. Does Section 23 of the ITBP Force Act treat peacetime disobedience differently?

Yes, under Section 23 of the Act, disobeying a command while not on active duty carries a maximum sentence of five years, compared to fourteen years for active duty.

3. Can a hand signal count as a command under Section 23 of the border police law?

Yes, Section 23 of The Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992 specifies that commands can be given orally, in writing, by signal, or otherwise.

Test yourself

Q1.Under Section 23 of The Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992, what is the maximum punishment for disobeying a lawful command while not on active duty?

Q2.Under Section 23 of The Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992, which method of giving a command is explicitly mentioned alongside oral and written orders?

Q3.Under Section 23 of The Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992, what is the penalty for willful defiance of authority given personally by a superior?

Q4.Under Section 23 of The Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992, how does the penalty change if simple disobedience occurs on active duty?

22PreviousSection 22 Striking or threatening superior officers.24NextSection 24 Insubordination and obstruction.

←Section 22 Section 24→