Central

Section 3 of The Hindu Gains of Learning Act, 1930

Gains of learning not to be held, not to be separate property of acquirer merely for certain reasons.

Notwithstanding any custom, rule or interpretation of the Hindu Law, no gains of learning shall be held not to be the exclusive and separate property of the acquirer merely by reason of—

(a)his learning having been; in whole or in part, imparted to him by any member, living or deceased, of his family, or with the aid of the joint funds of his family, or with the aid of the funds of any member thereof, or
(b)himself or his family having, while he was acquiring his learning, been maintained or supported, wholly or in part, by the joint funds of his family, or by the funds of any member thereof.

Summary

Despite any custom, rule, or interpretation of Hindu law, a person's gains of learning are their own exclusive and separate property.
Your earnings from your education cannot be treated as joint family property merely because a family member (living or deceased) taught you or because family funds paid for your school.
Your earnings cannot be claimed by the family merely because you or your family were maintained (meaning supported with food, shelter, or money) using joint family funds while you were getting your education.
This rule applies regardless of whether the family funds used were joint family funds or the separate funds of any individual family member.

Practical examples

1In 1931, Gopal's father, who is part of a joint Hindu family, uses 2,000 rupees from the family's joint savings to send Gopal to medical school. After Gopal becomes a doctor and earns 1,500 rupees a month, Section 3 applies, meaning those earnings belong solely to Gopal as his separate property, and the family cannot claim them just because they paid for his medical education.

2In 1933, Vikram is learning to be an accountant. While he is studying, his wife and children are maintained (supported with food and housing) by his joint family using their common funds. When Vikram starts earning a salary, the family cannot claim his salary as joint property merely because they supported his family during his studies.

FAQ

1. Does it matter if my father or uncle was the one who taught me my skills?

No, the text states that your earnings are your separate property even if your learning was imparted (taught) to you, in whole or in part, by any member of your family, whether they are living or deceased.

2. What if the joint family funds paid for my college tuition?

Your earnings are still your exclusive and separate property. The law says your property cannot be held to be joint family property merely because your education was funded with the aid of the joint funds of your family or any individual member.

3. What does "notwithstanding any custom, rule or interpretation" mean in plain words?

It means "regardless of" any traditional practices, old laws, or court interpretations that existed before this law. This Act overrides them all.

Test yourself

1.Under Section 3, a person's gains of learning are considered to be:

2.Section 3 applies regardless of (or "notwithstanding") what?

3.Can the family claim a member's educational earnings merely because joint family funds were used to pay for the member's education?

4.What does Section 3 say about an acquirer whose family was supported by joint family funds while he was studying?

5.Whose funds are mentioned in Section 3 as potentially aiding the learning without making the earnings joint property?

2PreviousSection 2 Definitions.4NextSection 4 Savings.

←Section 2 Section 4→